Samantha Iellimo
201- College
Professor Goeller
October 15, 2013
Working Title: The DREAM Act and American College Students
Topic
The
DREAM Act is a piece of immigration reform legislation first introduced in 2001
that aims to aid illegal minors in achieving legal status through higher
education. The DREAM Act, which stands for Development, Relief, and Education
for Alien Minors offers a path to American citizenship for students who were
most likely brought to the United States as children and have known no other
home. The United States is the only country they have ever known, and sometimes
they are unaware of their illegal status until they attempt to apply for a
college education. The DREAM Act allows these minors to be eligible for federal
and state financial aid, and if two years of higher education or military
service is completed, they are eligible for American citizenship. This piece of legislation has been talked
about for many years in the political arena, but it has not been passed yet
because of the many who oppose it based on its’ unfairness to American college
students. The goal of my research paper is to prove how the DREAM Act will not negatively impact American college
students economically and will even offer positive consequences. I will offer counter-arguments that include
the use of privatization facts for the possible negative impacts of the Act, as
well as positive impacts that will result from alien minors receiving higher
education.
Research Question
How
will the DREAM Act negatively and positively impact American college students’
economic futures?
The Opposition
When Alabama’s unemployment rate soared
above the National Average to ten percent, Republican Governor Robert Bentley
signed a law that would attack this problem and essentially aim to create more
jobs for legal Alabama residents. According to Amanda Beadle at
ThinkProgress.org, the law, passed in June of 2011 and deemed “the nation’s
harshest immigration law” makes it “illegal to even live as an
undocumented immigrant in Alabama” by announcing it unlawful for illegal
immigrants to participate in a business transaction with the state (Beadle
2).For those like Alabama Governor Robert Bentley, whose law “has become a
point of pride of some Alabama Republicans” (Beadle 1), it seems that the
general opinion of his supporters is that illegal immigration has a negative
impact on the United States’ job market and ultimately harms citizen workers.
According to Jennifer D. Williams, “U.S. jobs continue to be viewed as the chief
attraction for illegal aliens” (Williams 29). In her 1990 article, “Illegal
Immigration: the Effects on Native Born Workers”, Linda Levine introduces the
“displacement effect”, which is used to describe a negative consequence of
illegal immigration on American, or “native” workers. The “displacement effect”
illustrates that because illegals accept less money for lower skilled jobs,
workers wages become lower, and therefore “native-born workers will find other
activities to be more attractive”. Levine explains that as a result, “they
leave the labor force and employment among the native-born population, as noted
above, declines”. As American workers leave and lose their jobs to
workers that accept lower pay and therefore cost the employer less money, “the
initial employment of foreign-born workers expands as they assume a portion of
the jobs formerly held by native-born workers” (Levine 51). The theory affirms
that American workers are therefore “displaced” and thereby explains why
Republicans believe that illegal aliens in our job market are a negative
influence.
In
Support of the DREAM Act
In her article, Linda Levine plainly states that, “immigrants
affect the private economy in their role as workers” (Levine 50), and as I
uncovered more information it became clear that illegals actually do have a
positive effect on the job market by causing job growth, which will actually
aid American college students. To explain this belief, Ramanujan Nadadur
utilizes his 2009 article titled, “Illegal Immigration: A positive Economic
Contribution to the United States”, to assert the idea that “illegal immigrants
perform jobs that no US worker will fill” and he expands on this notion by
introducing the “dual labor market theory” (Nadadur 1041-1042). According to
Nadadur, the theory suggests that the United States labor market consists of
two parts: the skilled primary sector and the unskilled secondary sector. The
former is characterized by “skilled work, employment stability, the presence of
job ladders, effective trade unions and efficient management”. As for the
second sector, it contrarily consists of “low or unskilled work or
service jobs, linked by the fact that they are characterized by low earnings,
job impermanence and low returns on education” (Nadadur 1041). Since most
Native American workers seek jobs in the first sector where the conditions are
more favorable, it seems obvious that a shortage is created in the secondary
sector. Illegal immigrants, who employers are forced to turn to, then fill this
shortage of lower waged manual jobs. Nadadur summarizes that “in short, there
are more jobs in the secondary sector than there are native workers to fill
those jobs”, and therefore by taking them, illegal immigrants benefit the job
market.
Conclusion
In my research paper, I will explore these topics further and
provide further arguments to support the passing of the DREAM Act. I believe
that the law will actually benefit college students in the long run and is not
an unfair law. I believe that any arguments against the DREAM Act, stating
negative impact, can be disputed. Though there is the argument that it could
cause an increase in costs for American students, privatization is creating
more of a negative impact on the wallets of students. The DREAM Act is a piece
of legislation that will keep us moving forward.
Bibliography
Conlan,
Mark Gabrish. "The Effects of Illegal Immigration: An Overview."
Print. Rpt. in
Illegal Immigration. Ed.
William Barbour. San Diego: Greenhaven, 1994. 67-71.
Print.
"Governor Brown Signs Second Half Of
California Dream Act.” Fox News – Breaking
News Updates | Latest News Headlines | Photos
& News Videos. 08
Oct. 2011.
Web. 21 Oct. 2011
Horwedel,
Dina M. "For Illegal Students, an Uncertain Future." Diverse:
Issues in Higher
Education 23.6 (2006): 22-26. Academic OneFile.
Web. 05 Nov. 2011.
Levine,
Linda. "Immigration: The Effects on Native-Born Workers." Print. Rpt.
in
Politics of Immigration. Ed.
A.M. Babkina. New York: Nova Science.
Print.
Motomura, Hiroshi, Making Legal: The Dream Act, Birthright Citizenship, and Broad-Scale
Legalization (January 15, 2013). 16 Lewis & Clark Law Review 1127-48 (2012); UCLA
School of Law Research Paper No. 13-01.
Motomura, Hiroshi, Making Legal: The Dream Act, Birthright Citizenship, and Broad-Scale
Legalization (January 15, 2013). 16 Lewis & Clark Law Review 1127-48 (2012); UCLA
School of Law Research Paper No. 13-01.
Ramanujan Nadadur (2009): Illegal Immigration: A Positive Economic
Contribution to
the United States, Journal of Ethnic and
Migration Studies, 35:6, 1037-1052
Williams,
Jennifer D. "Immigration: Recent Estimates of the U.S. Illegal Alien
Population." Print. Rpt. in Politics
of Immigration. Ed. A.M. Babkina. New York:
Nova Science.
ok, this is a good focus. I like that you are going to deal with the immigration debate head on, and you should find a way to engage with the economics of it, as that probably connects most directly to the college question.
ReplyDelete